diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'sample/unary_numbers/AckSZ-3_5.in')
| -rw-r--r-- | sample/unary_numbers/AckSZ-3_5.in | 49 |
1 files changed, 49 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/sample/unary_numbers/AckSZ-3_5.in b/sample/unary_numbers/AckSZ-3_5.in new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4f41966 --- /dev/null +++ b/sample/unary_numbers/AckSZ-3_5.in @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +// Ackermann function on unary natural numbers + +// Originally the function is written as follows: +// fun ack(0,y) = y+1 +// | ack(x,0) = ack(x-1,1) +// | ack(x,y) = ack(x-1,ack(x,y-1)); + +// This is written one on unary natural nunbers: +// fun ack(Z , y) = S(y) +// | ack(S(x), Z) = ack(x,S(Z)) +// | ack(S(x), S(y)) = ack(x,ack(S(x),y)); + +// For easily translation to interaction nets, +// the first argument will be moved to the last: +// fun ack(y, Z) = S(y) +// | ack(Z, S(x)) = ack(S(Z),x) +// | ack(S(y), S(x)) = ack(ack(y,S(x)),x); + +// It is traslated directly as follows: +// ack(r,y)>< Z => r~S(y); +// ack(r,y)>< S(x) => ack_Sx(r, x)~y; +// ack_Sx(r,x)>< Z => ack(r, S(Z))~x; +// ack_Sx(r,x)>< S(y) => Dup(x1,x2)~x, ack(r,cnt)~x1, ack(cnt,y)~S(x2); + +// The last connection can be optimised by applying the rule ack><S, +// so finally we get the following as the result of the translation: +ack(r,y)>< Z => r~S(y); +ack(r,y)>< S(x) => ack_Sx(r, x)~y; +ack_Sx(r,x)>< Z => ack(r, S(Z))~x; +ack_Sx(r,x)>< S(y) => Dup(x1,x2)~x, ack(r,cnt)~x1, ack_Sx(cnt,x2)~y; + + +// By the way, it is possible to write it by using abbreviation notation: +// ack(r,y)>< Z => r~S(y); +// ack(r,y)>< S(x) => r<<ack_Sx(x,y); +// ack_Sx(r,x)>< Z => r<<ack(S(Z),x); +// ack_Sx(r,x)>< S(y) => x1,x2<<Dup(x), r<<ack(cnt,x1), cnt<<ack_Sx(x2,y); + + +// Dup is defined as built-in: +// Dup(a1,a2)>< Z => a1~Z, a2~Z; +// Dup(a1,a2)>< S(x) => a1~S(w1), a2~S(w2), Dup(w1,w2)~x; + +// ack(result, y)~x +// For computation `ack 3 5', it is written as follows: +ack(result, S(S(S(S(S(Z))))))~S(S(S(Z))); + +prnat result; +exit; |
