diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | .gitignore | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | comparison/Inpla/sptestInpla.sh | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | comparison/Inpla/src/msort-800000-reuse.in | 51 |
3 files changed, 12 insertions, 43 deletions
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0793f52 --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ + +comparison/Inpla/src/msort-800000-reuse.in~ diff --git a/comparison/Inpla/sptestInpla.sh b/comparison/Inpla/sptestInpla.sh index 36044a6..90f7436 100644 --- a/comparison/Inpla/sptestInpla.sh +++ b/comparison/Inpla/sptestInpla.sh @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ # repeat and waittime -ct=1 +ct=10 waittime=5 max_threads=9 diff --git a/comparison/Inpla/src/msort-800000-reuse.in b/comparison/Inpla/src/msort-800000-reuse.in index 36723b9..5f57484 100644 --- a/comparison/Inpla/src/msort-800000-reuse.in +++ b/comparison/Inpla/src/msort-800000-reuse.in @@ -1,39 +1,11 @@ // Merge sort MS(ret) >< [] => ret~[]; -MS(ret) >< x:xs => MS_tail(ret, x)~xs; +MS(ret) >< x:xs => (*L)MS_tail(ret, x)~xs; -MS_tail(ret, n) >< [] => ret~(*R)[n]; +MS_tail(ret, int n) >< [] => ret~[n]; MS_tail(ret, int n) >< x:xs => -// MS(a)~left, MS(b)~right, Append(ret,a)~b, -// Split(0, left,right) ~ (n:x:xs); - MS(a)~left, MS(b)~right, Append(ret,a)~b, - (*L)Split(left,right) ~ (*R)(n:x:xs); - - -/* -Splitn(int flag, a, b) >< [] => a~[], b~[]; -Splitn(int flag, a, b) >< (int y):ys -| flag==0 => b~(*R)(y:cnt), (*L)Splitn(1, a, cnt)~ys -| _ => a~(*R)(y:cnt), (*L)Splitn(0, cnt, b)~ys; - -Split(a,b) >< x:xs => Splitn(0,a,b)~x:xs; -*/ - -Split(a,b) >< [] => a~[], b~[]; -Split(a,b) >< x:xs => a~(x:cntl), (*L)Split(b,cntl)~xs; - - - -// この実験から、Merge は悪くないことがわかる。 -// Part でも -t 5 6 7 順に速くなる。 -// つまり、Split が悪いと言える。 - -/* -MS_tail(ret, n) >< [] => ret~(*R)[n]; -MS_tail(ret, n) >< x:xs => - MS(a)~left, MS(b)~right, Merge(ret,b)~a, - (*L)Split(left,right) ~ (*R)(n:x:xs); -*/ + Split(left,right) ~ (*R)(n:x:xs), + MS(a)~left, MS(b)~right, (*L)Merge(ret,b)~a; Merge(ret, snd) >< [] => ret~snd; Merge(ret, snd) >< x:xs => (*L)MergeCC(ret, x, xs)~snd; @@ -42,24 +14,19 @@ MergeCC(ret, int y, ys) >< [] => ret~(*R)(y:ys); MergeCC(ret, int y, ys) >< (int x):xs | x <= y => ret~(x:cnt), (*L)MergeCC(cnt, y, ys) ~ xs | _ => ret~(y:cnt), (*L)MergeCC(cnt, x, xs) ~ ys; -// ret~(*R)(x:cnt) less improvement - -// *** I should make an option that outputs bytecodes to a file. *** -// *** Then, I have to look the reason why -// *** ret~(*R)(x:cnt), MergeCC(cnt, y, ys) ~ xs becomes less improvement. - +Split(right,left) >< [] => right~[], left~[]; +Split(right,left) >< x:xs => + right~(*R)(x:cntl), left~cntr, (*L)Split(cntr,cntl)~xs; -// left~cntr, (*L)Split(cntr,cntl)~xs, right~(x:cntl); -// This also make it less efficient. -const LIST_ELEM=1200000; +const LIST_ELEM=800000; MkRandList(ret) >< (int n) | n>0 => ret~(rd:cnt), (*L)MkRandList(cnt)~(n-1) - where rd=rand(LIST_ELEM) + where rd=rand(10000) | _ => ret~[]; MkRandList(cnt)~(LIST_ELEM), |
