Bug Fix

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 42 deletions

diff --git a/comparison/Inpla/src/msort-800000-reuse.in b/comparison/Inpla/src/msort-800000-reuse.in
index 36723b9..5f57484 100644
--- a/comparison/Inpla/src/msort-800000-reuse.in
+++ b/comparison/Inpla/src/msort-800000-reuse.in
@@ -1,39 +1,11 @@
 // Merge sort
 MS(ret) >< [] => ret~[];
-MS(ret) >< x:xs => MS_tail(ret, x)~xs;
+MS(ret) >< x:xs => (*L)MS_tail(ret, x)~xs;
 
-MS_tail(ret, n) >< [] => ret~(*R)[n];
+MS_tail(ret, int n) >< [] => ret~[n];
 MS_tail(ret, int n) >< x:xs => 
-//	MS(a)~left, MS(b)~right, Append(ret,a)~b,
-//	Split(0, left,right) ~ (n:x:xs);
-	MS(a)~left, MS(b)~right, Append(ret,a)~b,
-	(*L)Split(left,right) ~ (*R)(n:x:xs);
-
-
-/*
-Splitn(int flag, a, b) >< [] => a~[], b~[];
-Splitn(int flag, a, b) >< (int y):ys
-| flag==0 => b~(*R)(y:cnt), (*L)Splitn(1, a, cnt)~ys
-| _       => a~(*R)(y:cnt), (*L)Splitn(0, cnt, b)~ys;
-
-Split(a,b) >< x:xs => Splitn(0,a,b)~x:xs;
-*/
-
-Split(a,b) >< [] => a~[], b~[];
-Split(a,b) >< x:xs => a~(x:cntl), (*L)Split(b,cntl)~xs;
-
-
-
-// この実験から、Merge は悪くないことがわかる。
-// Part でも -t 5 6 7 順に速くなる。
-// つまり、Split が悪いと言える。
-
-/*
-MS_tail(ret, n) >< [] => ret~(*R)[n];
-MS_tail(ret, n) >< x:xs => 
-	MS(a)~left, MS(b)~right, Merge(ret,b)~a,
-	(*L)Split(left,right) ~ (*R)(n:x:xs);
-*/
+	Split(left,right) ~ (*R)(n:x:xs),
+	MS(a)~left, MS(b)~right, (*L)Merge(ret,b)~a;
 
 Merge(ret, snd) >< [] => ret~snd;
 Merge(ret, snd) >< x:xs => (*L)MergeCC(ret, x, xs)~snd;
@@ -42,24 +14,19 @@ MergeCC(ret, int y, ys) >< [] => ret~(*R)(y:ys);
 MergeCC(ret, int y, ys) >< (int x):xs
 | x <= y => ret~(x:cnt), (*L)MergeCC(cnt, y, ys) ~ xs
 | _      => ret~(y:cnt), (*L)MergeCC(cnt, x, xs) ~ ys;
-// ret~(*R)(x:cnt) less improvement
-
-// *** I should make an option that outputs bytecodes to a file. ***
-// *** Then, I have to look the reason why 
-// *** ret~(*R)(x:cnt), MergeCC(cnt, y, ys) ~ xs becomes less improvement.
-
 
 
+Split(right,left) >< [] => right~[], left~[];
+Split(right,left) >< x:xs =>
+	right~(*R)(x:cntl), left~cntr, (*L)Split(cntr,cntl)~xs;
 
-//	left~cntr, (*L)Split(cntr,cntl)~xs, right~(x:cntl);
-// This also make it less efficient.
 
 
-const LIST_ELEM=1200000;
+const LIST_ELEM=800000;
 
 MkRandList(ret) >< (int n)
 | n>0 => ret~(rd:cnt), (*L)MkRandList(cnt)~(n-1) 
-  where rd=rand(LIST_ELEM)
+  where rd=rand(10000)
 | _ => ret~[];
 
 MkRandList(cnt)~(LIST_ELEM),